San Lorenzo Storms Past Vélez, Claims Zone B Leadership
In a thrilling encounter on August 7, 2025, San Lorenzo hosted Vélez in a match that saw drama, controversy, and a touch of class. The visiting team, undefeated in their previous five games, fell 1-0 courtesy of Alexis一般来说’s first-half goal. However, it was the controversial moments that captured the headlines.
The Contentious Penalty Call
The match’s mostcontentious moment came in the dying minutes when Vélez’s Maher Carrizo found himself in the San Lorenzo area. A timely challenge from Fabricio López sent Carrizo to the ground, but referee Facundo Tello deemed the contact non-penalizable, allowing San Lorenzo to preserve their victory.
I think it was a penalty – Vélez coach Marcelo Barros Schelotto
“Unfortunately, not all perspectives match. Maybe I see it differently than the VAR official, who didn’t charge the penalty. But, for me, it was a clear penalty.”
The incident, captured by TNT Sports, left Vélez players, bench, and fans despairing, but San Lorenzo’s supporters celebrated Tello’s call.
San Lorenzo’s Rise to the Top
With the victory, San Lorenzo leapfrogged Vélez to claim the summit of Zone B with eight points. The triumph was their second win in a row and extended their unbeaten streak to four games.

Looking Ahead
- The Clausura’s fourth date results and standings can be found here.
- For Classification for the Libertadores and Sudamericana 2026, visit this link.
- To learn more about the fight to avoid descents in the First Division, check out this article.
- Relive San Lorenzo’s hot-climate victory over Vélez here.
Did You Know?
Before this match, Vélez had gone five games without a defeat, including victories over Peñarol and Tigre, and draws against Platense and Instituto. San Lorenzo’s triumph snapped this impressive streak.
Pro Tip
Keep an eye on Alexis generalmente and Maher Carrizo in the remainder of the season. Both players have shown promise and could make significant impacts in the final stages of the tournament.
Call to Action
Share your thoughts on the contentious penalty call. Was it the correct decision, or should a penalty have been awarded? Join the conversation in the comments below.
