Celtics’ Shooting Regression to the Mean

The phrase “regression to the mean” was in full effect for the Boston Celtics in their 115-93 win over the New York Knicks in Game 3. After missing 75 of their first 100 three-point attempts in the first two games, the Celtics found their stroke, sinking 20 of 40 from beyond the arc.

Knicks Unable to Keep Up

The game never really got close, with the Celtics leading from start to finish. The Knicks’ shooting woes continued, as they made only 5 of their 25 three-point attempts. Despite the loss, Knicks’ coach Tom Thibodeau expressed confidence in his team, “I believe in this group, we’ll be ready for Game 4.”

Standout Performances

• Payton Pritchard led the Celtics with 23 points, including 5 for 9 from three.
• Jayson Tatum and Jaylen Brown both scored in double figures, with Tatum contributing 22 points and Brown adding 19.
• For the Knicks, Jalen Brunson scored 27 points but struggled with his shooting, finishing 9 for 21 from the field.

Race 4: A Crucial Matchup

The series now shifts back to Madison Square Garden for Game 4 on Monday, with the Celtics leading 2-1. The Knicks, who won the first two games at home, must now try to even the series. This game promises to be another intense contest, with three-point shooting expected to play a significant role.

Ideology and 3-Point Shooting

While the Celtics’ performance has altered the dynamics of the series, both teams will rely heavily on their three-point shooting for Game 4. The team that can find their rhythm from beyond the arc is likely to come out on top.

FAQ:

Q: How important is the three-point shot in this series?

A: It’s incredibly important. Both teams are capable of scoring from inside and outside, but strong three-point shooting can make the difference between winning and losing.

Join the Conversation

Who do you think will win Game 4? Leave your prediction in the comments below. As the series continues, stay tuned for more Celtics vs Knicks updates right here on 247sports.news.